What to ask, what vendors should demonstrate, and how to establish whether identified savings reach your invoices.
Choosing telecom expense management software is easier when you know what to ask beyond the product demonstration. Reporting, invoice processing and savings estimates all deserve attention. So does the work required to correct a bill, cancel an unnecessary service or recover a supplier credit.
A useful starting point is to bring a telecom cost problem from your own organisation into the evaluation. Ask each provider to explain how it would investigate the issue, who would resolve it and what evidence would confirm the financial result.
The following seven checks will help you compare providers on their ability to reduce unnecessary expenditure and keep it under control.
1. Check that it covers your telecom environment
Start with the services you need to manage: mobile, fixed and cloud voice, network connectivity, or a combination. List your main providers, locations and billing formats, along with the problems creating the most work.
Be specific about coverage. A platform might import a supplier’s invoices but require additional configuration to reconcile individual charges against contracts or allocate them to branches.
You may choose to begin with one area. Establish what expanding into other services would involve, including additional licences, integrations and implementation work.
Ask the provider to demonstrate: How it would bring your main service types and supplier bills into a consistent view, with charges traceable to individual services and locations.
2. Establish how it determines what you should be paying
An invoice shows what the supplier has charged. Assessing whether that charge is justified requires agreed rates, contract dates, service records and usage information.
Look for a provider that can explain how it builds and maintains this baseline. Missing contracts, inconsistent service identifiers and outdated inventories should be addressed during the evaluation: they affect what the software can reliably validate.
For example, a service with no recorded usage may be unnecessary—or it may provide essential backup connectivity. A saving should remain a proposal until the business has checked the service’s purpose and contractual obligations.
Ask the provider to demonstrate: How it checks a charge against the relevant contract and service record, and what happens when supporting information is missing.
3. Clarify who turns findings into action
Once an issue is identified, someone must investigate it, obtain approval and follow through with the supplier. Establish how this work will be divided between your team and the provider.
Software alone may suit an organisation with experienced staff and capacity to manage these activities. Others may need managed services to maintain records, coordinate changes and pursue disputes.
Get that division of responsibility into the proposal. Include who submits cancellation requests, manages escalations and checks supplier responses. This also helps reveal how much internal effort the solution will require.
Ask the provider to demonstrate: How an identified billing discrepancy receives an owner, supporting evidence, a next action and a tracked resolution.
4. Agree how savings will be measured
Ask providers to separate the financial outcomes they report.
Â
| Outcome | Evidence to look for |
|---|---|
| Potential saving | A validated opportunity, with assumptions and required actions recorded. |
| Recurring cost reduction | A lower charge confirmed on subsequent invoices. |
| One-off recovery | A credit or refund received and reconciled. |
| Cost avoidance | A documented estimate of a future expense prevented, reported separately from realised savings. |
Â
Agree the comparison baseline with Finance. Lower expenditure could reflect fewer users, closed sites or reduced usage, so the calculation should explain what changed and which actions produced the result.
Also check how cancellation penalties, implementation charges and ongoing fees affect the net benefit.
Ask the provider to demonstrate: One saving from its initial estimate through to invoice evidence, including when it took effect and how double-counting is prevented.
5. Test the fit with Finance, IT and Procurement
A telecom cost needs an owner and a place in your financial reporting. Check whether the solution can allocate expenditure to your cost centres, departments, users and locations—and keep those allocations current.
Be precise about integrations. Find out which systems exchange data, how frequently updates occur and whether the process uses an existing connector, a file transfer or custom development.
Include security in this assessment. Your IT team should review access controls, audit history, data handling and relevant independent assurance.
Ask the provider to demonstrate: How a charge reaches the correct cost centre, how an ownership change is handled and how access to the underlying information is controlled.
6. Understand implementation and the full cost
Request an implementation plan that names the data, people and decisions required from your organisation. It should distinguish initial data loading from the point at which records have been validated and meaningful checks can begin.
Compare costs over the same period and scope. Include onboarding, subscriptions, integrations, managed services, internal effort and any fees linked to savings or recoveries. Ask what changes as your service volumes grow.
Ongoing maintenance deserves equal attention. Establish who updates records when employees leave, contracts renew or sites close, and how you can retrieve your data if the arrangement ends.
Ask the provider to demonstrate: A proposed onboarding schedule with responsibilities, acceptance criteria and a complete breakdown of included and additional costs.
7. Put the provider through a practical test
Use the same scenario with shortlisted providers so their responses are comparable.
Consider this illustrative example: a branch closes and the organisation requests cancellation of its network circuit. Charges continue on later invoices.
Ask the provider to walk through:
- Finding the circuit, contract and cancellation request.
- Establishing the effective termination date and any valid remaining charges.
- Quantifying incorrect billing and assigning the dispute.
- Tracking the supplier’s response and any credit.
- Confirming that subsequent billing reflects the agreed resolution.
Record which steps the software supports, which require people and which sit outside the proposed service. If AI is part of the pitch, ask the provider to show its role in this scenario, including the evidence and human review behind its recommendations.
Request a relevant customer reference or documented example to support the demonstration.
Ask the provider to demonstrate: The complete resolution process, including the records that would allow your Finance team to verify the outcome.
How OneView approaches these requirements
OneView’s approach to Telecom Expense Management follows the relationship between contracts, active services, ownership, invoices, discrepancies and supplier resolution. Its modular coverage spans mobile, voice and network expenditure, allowing organisations to begin with their most pressing area and extend from there.
Alongside the platform, OneView Managed Services supports activities such as maintaining service and ownership records, investigating exceptions and coordinating suppliers and approvals. The scope can therefore address both the information needed to make a decision and the operational work needed to carry it through.
When choosing a TEM provider, use these seven checks to establish what will happen in your environment, what your team will need to contribute and how results will be verified. The strongest proposal should make those responsibilities and outcomes clear before implementation begins.
Explore OneView Telecom Expense Management and bring your telecom cost challenges into the conversation.
